( ESNUG 288 Item 9 ) ----------------------------------------------- [5/7/98]

Subject: ( ESNUG 287 #4 ) Need 98.02 Ultra License To Replace Old Commands?

>We're attempting to run 98.02 and have found an interesting requirement of
>another license (DC Ultra) in order to use one of the new commands that
>replaces an obsolete compilier option (prioritize_min_paths).
>
>set_cost_priority gives an error message.
>
>Has anyone else run into this problem?
>
>  - Mark Fox
>    Advanced Micro Devices


From: tboydsto@su102s.ess.harris.com (Ted Boydston)

Yep, I ran into that problem too.  Specifically, I ran into the Ultra license
issue when I tried to set up my own cost priority to something other than 
default or delay.  That is:

  set_cost_priority \
    { max_capacitance max_delay max_fanout } => Ultra license required
  set_cost_priority defualt                  => no Ultra license required
  set_cost_priority -delay                   => no Ultra license required

Oh, by the way, my local apps engineer mentioned no need for a new license to
use this feature during the 98.02 orientation session, and neither does the 
man page.  Lost in License Land,

  - Ted Boydston
    Harris Government Aerospace Systems Division

         ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----   ----

From: Kelly Fromm <kellyf@packetengines.com>

Hi, John,

We have seen exactly the same results with set_cost_priority.  However, 98.02
is backwards compatible with -proiritize_min_paths, so we have continued to
use it.  It still works.  Here is what we are seeing...

  dc_shell> set_cost_priority min_delay
     Error: DC ultra license is required to use feature 'set_cost_priority'.
     (UIO-65)
  0
  dc_shell> compile -prioritize_min_paths
     Warning: As a result of -prioritize_min_path, min_delay is made a
     higher priority than max_delay. (UIO-58)

I thought it was a bad move for consumers when compile -scan also required
full time use of a Test Compiler license, and now instead of having lots of
DC licenses and a few TC, we need near equal numbers.  Now it seems that we
will need more licen$e$ just to keep min-path fixing?   

  - Kelly Fromm
    Packet Engines

         ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----   ----

From: Bob Wiegand <rwiegand@ensoniq.com>

John,

The prioritize_min_paths compile option is still there.  As far as I can
tell it still works as expected, and the DC Ultra license is not required.
The option was removed from the documentation only.

  - Bob Wiegand
    Ensoniq



 Sign up for the DeepChip newsletter.
Email
 Read what EDA tool users really think.


Feedback About Wiretaps ESNUGs SIGN UP! Downloads Trip Reports Advertise

"Relax. This is a discussion. Anything said here is just one engineer's opinion. Email in your dissenting letter and it'll be published, too."
This Web Site Is Modified Every 2-3 Days
Copyright 1991-2024 John Cooley.  All Rights Reserved.
| Contact John Cooley | Webmaster | Legal | Feedback Form |

   !!!     "It's not a BUG,
  /o o\  /  it's a FEATURE!"
 (  >  )
  \ - / 
  _] [_     (jcooley 1991)