( ESNUG 560 Item 2 ) -------------------------------------------- [04/29/16]
Subject: EDA/IP worldwide 2014 vs. 2015 sales, and Lucio Lanza resurgence
YEAR-VS.-YEAR-DATA: Here's all the EDAC (oops! That's now the "Electronic
System Design Alliance) year 2014 vs. year 2015 total EDA and IP sales stats.
|
Products
|
2014
sales
|
2015
sales
|
percent
change
|
Frontend tools
(CAE)
RTL-to-gates EDA
|
$2,542.3 million
|
$2,570.9 million
|
+1.1%
|
Backend tools
(IC Physical)
gates-to-GDSII EDA
|
$1,531.3 million
|
$1,591.0 million
|
+3.9%
|
PCB and MCM
plus IC package
design tools
|
$681.7 million
|
$644.6 million
|
-5.4%
|
Consulting Services
Custom Development
and Training
|
$401.8 million
|
$414.2 million
|
+12.4%
|
The 2015 breakout of EDA vs. IP vs. Services:
EDA sold : : ############################### 62%
IP sold : : ################ 33%
Services sold : : ### 5%
What's interesting here is:
- If you add up the CAE + IC + PCB/MCM sales for either 2014
or 2015, it ballparks around $4.8 billion. Yet total consulting
services revenus in the same timeframe is around $0.4 billion.
That is, the EDA companies make 1/12th their revenues from using
their own EDA tools vs. selling their own EDA tools.
- The reason why is EDA companies get significantly lower profit
margins from selling services around their EDA tools.
I once asked Wally Rhines, CEO of Mentor, if consulting is so
close to being unprofitable, why bother offering it all? "Because
sometimes that's what's needed to make the EDA tool sale," answered
Wally. "We never lose money on a consulting deal, but it's just
good customer service to rent them our engineers to either learn our
tools, or to get the customer through a rough spot."
And I don't know why PCB/MCM/packaging went down 5.4%??? (Huh? Shouldn't
it instead be growing because of the big push in IoT everywhere?? You know,
because IoT is lots, and lots, and lots of little PCB's and MCM's???)
If anyone has an explaination of why PCB/MCM went down, please email me.
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
EDA/IP/SERVICES SALES BY GEOGRAPHY...
|
Region
|
2014
sales
|
2015
sales
|
percent
change
|
|
North America
|
$3,332.5 million
|
$3,534.2 million
|
+6.1%
|
Europe plus
Middle East plus
Africa
|
$1,212.9 million
|
$1,197.2 million
|
-1.3%
|
|
Japan
|
$795.2 million
|
$786.6 million
|
-8.6%
|
All other PacRim
excluding Japan
|
$2,095.7 million
|
$2,287.6 million
|
+9.2%
|
The 2015 world breakout of EDA/IP/Services total:
Americas : : ###################### 45%
Europe, etc. : : ######## 15%
Japan : : ### 10%
China, Taiwan,
Korea, etc. : : ############### 29%
PacRim and the U.S. are hot and growing. While Japan and Europe are the
places were sales are shrinking.
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
MEANWHILE ON THE IP FRONT...
Semiconductor IP
(SIP)
includes both hard & soft IP
|
$2,279.0 million
|
$2,584.9 million
|
+13.4%
|
No surprizes here. SIP is a double digit (+13.4%) growth sector. That's
ARM, Ceva, ImagTec, Synopsys DW and ARC, Cadence TenSilica, Silicon Image,
Vivante, Sonics, eMemory, etc. bringing in that $2.6 billion in revenues.
As a comparision, Core (frontend + backend) EDA total world tool sales only
grew +2.2% in 2015 to $4.2 billion.
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
EDA/IP/SERVICES EMPLOYEE HEADCOUNT BY GEOGRAPHY...
The Q4 2015 world employee headcount breakout by region:
Americas : : ########################## 12,892 employees
Europe, etc. : : ############ 6,064
Japan : : #### 1,935
China, Taiwan,
Korea, etc. : : ################## 9,013
Which totals to 29,904 employees working in EDA/IP/Services.
Average EDA/IP/Services revenue per employee by region:
Americas : : ########################### $274,000 per employee
Europe, etc. : : #################### $197,000
Japan : : ######################################## $406,000
China, Taiwan,
Korea, etc. : : ######################### $254,000
Which, assuming no math errors, says that hiring engineers in Japan is where
an EDA/IP/services company will make the most in revenue-per-employee! And
conversely, Europe is were you'll make the least in revenue-per-employee.
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
AN UNEXPECTED ODD RESURGENCE... First the backstory. As a long time EDA
watcher, I always thought Lucio Lanza was (or still is) one of those fun
and funky characters to run into. With his heavy Italian accent and a
Godfather-like presence, over the years Lucio "pitched" EDA start-ups like
CadMos, Artisan, Forte, Epic Design, Mohave, Jasper, Gradient, Fabbrix, etc.
and to one degree or another they'd mostly all succeed in some way either
by acquisition or in their own right like PDF Solutions today with a market
cap of anywhere from ~$400m to ~$800m (depending on the moods of NASDAQ).
But something happened 5 years ago at the 2011 DAC. One of his 3 year old
start-ups, Extreme-DA was trying to take on the Synopsys PrimeTime monopoly
in digital static timing analysis -- and on the first day of that DAC'11,
Aart's lawyers served his Extreme-DA with a patent-infringement lawsuit.
To make a sad story short, within 4 months Extreme-DA was acquired by SNPS
(for what many believe to be at a fire-sale price), and for the past 5 years
after that Lucio Lanza would quietly show up at DAC's but he had pretty
stopped pitching EDA companies.
Then, out of nowhere, while 12 candidates are running for 8 elected slots
on the EDAC board -- 2 weeks ago Lucio is appointed to the board -- as
in "this guy is so special he doesn't have to run" appointed. ("Hell, even
Aart de Geus himself doesn't get that kind of special treatment!")
So next time you see Lucio, ask him what he knows -- because clearly Lucio
must know some deeeeeeeeep EDA or IP secrets that we don't know. (grin.)
- John Cooley
DeepChip.com Holliston, MA
Join
Index
Next->Item
|
|