( DAC'14 Item 10 ) ---------------------------------------------- [12/18/14]

Subject: Cadence Voltus is only nibbling on Apache Redhawk for IR-drop

APACHE IS STILL KING: A little over 13 months ago, DeepChip scooped that
Cadence was taking on the Apache Redhawk IP-drop near monopoly with Voltus
in ESNUG 534 #1.  Then 2 weeks before DAC'14, DeepChip got:

    Customer benchmark of Ansys/Apache RedHawk vs. Cadence Voltus

And looking at these post-DAC'14 user comments, it appears that the good
folks at Anysys/Apache doing Redhawk R&D and support are NOT going to be
losing their jobs any time too soon.

   SURVEY QUESTION #1:

        "What were the 3 or 4 most INTERESTING specific EDA tools
         you saw at DAC this year?  WHY did they interest you?"

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----   ----

    From my DAC discussions, my interest was mainly in Cadence Voltus. 

    The biggest factors for Voltus were 1) performance, 2) its peak
    memory usage allowed for higher capacity versus Apache.  

    I have not had any hands on experience to confirm this yet.

       ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----   ----

    Voltus has strong power analysis capabilities for the digital
    portion of a mixed-signal SoC.

    However, if people need a clean full-chip power analysis flow
    for mixed-signal designs, Apache is still far ahead of everyone.

       ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----   ----

    Cadence Voltus:

    While it sounds interesting, the Tempus-Voltus integration (when it
    happens) would be most beneficial for IR-drop effect-based STA

       ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----   ----

    I attended Cadence Tempus and Voltus Scalable Timing/Power Signoff
    session.  Voltus power signoff was presented well.

       ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----   ----

    Apache RedHawk-CPA, since this is their next attempt to more closely
    integrate IC and package co-design and co-analysis.

    Cadence Voltus-Fi: overcoming capacitity limitations of Redhawk

       ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----   ----

    So far we've seen no reason to drop Redhawk.

       ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----   ----

    We just renewed with Apache.  Voltus will have to wait 3 years.

       ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----   ----

    Ansys Redhawk

       ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----   ----

    Invarian

    We're looking for an Apache replacement.  Redhawk is too expensive.
    But we do not have the bandwidth for a Invarian eval.  This will
    drag until next year DAC.

       ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----   ----

    Invarian.  New blood is always welcome.

       ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----   ----

Related Articles

    Customer benchmark of Ansys/Apache RedHawk vs. Cadence Voltus
    Designer reviews new CDNS Voltus that takes on Apache Redhawk
    Invarian CEO insulted for being compared to dying Apache/Ansys

Join    Index    Next->Item






   
 Sign up for the DeepChip newsletter.
Email
 Read what EDA tool users really think.



Feedback About Wiretaps ESNUGs SIGN UP! Downloads Trip Reports Advertise

"Relax. This is a discussion. Anything said here is just one engineer's opinion. Email in your dissenting letter and it'll be published, too."
This Web Site Is Modified Every 2-3 Days
Copyright 1991-2024 John Cooley.  All Rights Reserved.
| Contact John Cooley | Webmaster | Legal | Feedback Form |

   !!!     "It's not a BUG,
  /o o\  /  it's a FEATURE!"
 (  >  )
  \ - / 
  _] [_     (jcooley 1991)