( ESNUG 480 Item 8 ) -------------------------------------------- [03/26/09]

Subject: "Positioning" consultant says Rajeev wants to sell to Cadence

This morning one of my readers sent me a link to a blog where an unknown
(unknown to me, at least) "strategy" consultant had written:

   "I sat down with Magma's CEO Rajeev Madhavan recently, and concluded
    that Rajeev has reconciled with the fact that he needs to get
    acquired soon, and that Cadence would be his preferred new home for
    Magma.  Rajeev says that he has kept Magma focused on R&D, and is
    the only company amongst the EDA majors to be able to do innovation
    internally.  I agree with this claim, and it is true that Magma has
    a very strong presence in the convergence device segment with market
    leaders like Qualcomm (QCOM), Broadcom (BRCM) and TI (TXI) as key
    customers.  Cadence would benefit from the capability of internal
    R&D and also the progress that Magma has made from a product point
    of view in the last year."

        - Sramana Mitra on SeekingAlpha.com on 03/25/09

Surprized, I sent an email to Rajeev directly asking: "Did you really tell
this mgmt consultant that you're looking to sell Magma?"

His reply:

   "Hi, John,

    Thanks for asking.  Everyone's entitled to write their own opinion and
    speculation but nope, I didn't say that.  Sramana has followed EDA for
    some time and definitely has a lot of ideas about the industry, a lot
    of which are interesting.  She brought up M&A and talked about
    consolidation in the industry. 

    I have said before that EDA is always active with M&A, but I've gotten
    merger questions a lot over the years and just don't respond when it
    comes to our own company (public companies can't do that).

    Right now my focus is on product news we're preparing to make at our
    MUSIC conference starting next week in Santa Clara.  (Sorry, had to get
    in that plug!)

    Also, I started using Twitter recently and used it to comment on what
    she said as soon as I saw the piece yesterday, but I'm glad for the
    chance for a deeper response to your readership.

    We intend to make news with our products.  Thanks."

        - Rajeev

OK, so this is Rajeev's diplomatic way of saying this Sramana Mitra lady was
full of crap.  And he's being consistant, too -- it wouldn't make sense that
Rajeev would now suddenly blather about Magma M&A rumors when, over the years,
he's so diligently NOT ever blathered about Magma M&A rumors before.

         ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----   ----

Which begs the question(s): who is this Sramana Mitra woman and why is she
writing this about Magma?  Why is she writing about EDA in general?  What's
her background?  What are her biases?  Who are her "strategy" customers?

         ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----   ----

[ 2 days later ]

It's Friday.  Now that I have some free time, let me google this mystery
consultant to see what more I can find out about our Ms. Sramana Mitra.

  - Sramana seems to blog primarily for a Wall Street audience on
    financial sites like SeekingAlpha.com, TheStreet.com, Forbes.com.
    She also has her own web site: SramanaMitra.com.

  - "Sramana has developed a well-regarded methodology for Positioning
    which she has used repeatedly in different situations and across
    a variety of market segments" from her bio on her own web site.

  - One of her clients is/was "a $100 Million Business Unit of Cadence"
    as reported in her SeekingAlpha.com bio.

  - In her 06/12/07 column in SeekingAlpha.com she writes "a Private
    Equity player buying Cadence doesn't make a hell of a lot of sense"
    while everyone else in EDA (and the New York Times) was buzzing
    about the Blackstone Group taking Cadence private.

  - On 01/31/08 Cadence stock dropped 53% (from $15.16 to $9.89).  In
    her 02/12/08 column, Sramana writes about the "competitive advantage"
    Cadence has with it's "EDA Card all-you-can-eat strategy" and further
    in the column she puts in bold:

      "This is the most profitable Cadence has been in a long time."

    She concludes her same column with:

      "For the moment, if you are an investor or fund manager considering
       buying Cadence's stock, your best bet is 'Market Share' based on
       'EDA Cards,' and not on innovation, or acquisition.  The bottom
       line is cold, hard sales."

  - She has written a number of columns advocating that Mentor should
    either be bought out or broken up by an LBO firm.  When Cadence finally
    made a hostile bid on Mentor, Sramana wrote that Mike Fister had showed
    some "boldness, some imagination, and possibly some courage, even."

    This woman really doesn't like Mentor.

  - Sramana also wrote many times about Magma's demise as in her "Will Magma
    Die on the Vine?" column or her "Natural Disasters: Is Magma's Loss
    Cadence's Win?" column or her "Magma Squeezed From Both Sides" column.

    This woman also really doesn't like Magma.

  - Back in 10/27/06 Sramana appeared to be more EDA USER oriented.

     "If EDA, as an industry, collapses, or becomes a monopoly/duopoly,
      the innovation in semiconductors will also stall." 

    Somewhere along the way she did a 180 degree reversal and now appears
    to back the Synopsys/Cadence Big Brother "Microsoft" model of EDA:

     "Once Magma is out of the picture, it will be Mentor's turn to be
      the company dying on the vine.  Whichever way we look at it, EDA
      needs to become a two-horse race as soon as possible, for vendors
      to regain some negotiating power over pricing, and address one of
      the core dysfunctions of the sector."  (03/25/09)

So, from what I've found on the web, Sramana Mitra is a strategy consultant
who specializes in "positioning" who happens to blog on some very big name
financial web sites and who did/does work for Cadence and she happens to
cheer the deaths of Magma and Mentor so "vendors" (presumably Cadence and
Synopsys) can regain some pricing power against the EDA BUYERS.

OK, so I might not like many of her ideas, but she seems to have thought
them out -- plus she's getting at least some Wall Street people to half
recognize the SNPS, CDNS, MENT, and LAVA ticker symbols.  Fair enough.

    - John Cooley
      DeepChip.com                               Holliston, MA

P.S. And after reading all those anti-Magma comments Sramana made
     throughout her writings, I'm floored that Rajeev managed to only
     call her ideas "interesting".  Talk about some amazing restraint!
Join    Index    Next->Item









   
 Sign up for the DeepChip newsletter.
Email
 Read what EDA tool users really think.


Feedback About Wiretaps ESNUGs SIGN UP! Downloads Trip Reports Advertise

"Relax. This is a discussion. Anything said here is just one engineer's opinion. Email in your dissenting letter and it'll be published, too."
This Web Site Is Modified Every 2-3 Days
Copyright 1991-2024 John Cooley.  All Rights Reserved.
| Contact John Cooley | Webmaster | Legal | Feedback Form |

   !!!     "It's not a BUG,
  /o o\  /  it's a FEATURE!"
 (  >  )
  \ - / 
  _] [_     (jcooley 1991)